Amirs of Caucasian Mujahideen
Sat., 25.11.1429 Hjr / 22.11.2008, 11:10 Djokhar time РусскийEnglishtürkçeУкраїнськийعربي

main

mirrors

add. formats
Google
Kavkaz-Center
WWW
Our button

News feeds
 
WorldEvents Also in this section

Lawmarks seek to bar US attack on Iran

Publication time: 20 January 2007, 10:47

A bipartisan group of lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives pushed legislation to prohibit a U.S. attack on Iran without congressional permission. 

 

The Thursday effort, led by Rep. Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican who in 2005 joined calls from many Democrats for a phased U.S. withdrawal from the Iraq war, came as lawmakers voiced concerns the Bush administration might provoke a confrontation with neighboring Iran. The resolution makes crystal clear that no previous resolution passed by Congress  authorizes a U.S. attack on Iran, Jones told reporters, referring to the 2002 vote by Congress authorizing the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

 

The joint resolution would have to be passed by the House and Senate and signed by President George W. Bush to acquire the force of law.

 

It would waive the congressional authorization only if Iran attacked the United States or its armed forces, or if such an attack was demonstrably  imminent.

 

So far, Jones' resolution has 11 co-sponsors in the 435-member House.

 

At the White House, Bush, asked whether there were any U.S. plans to take action against Iran, told Sinclair Broadcasting: I have made it clear that if they're moving weapons inside Iraq that will hurt the cause of democracy and more particularly hurt our soldiers, we'll take care of business there.

We're not going to let them,  he said.  I made that abundantly clear the other day in my speech.

Bush's comment echoed remarks last week when he accused Iran and Syria of allowing the use of their territory for launching attacks inside Iraq.

 

The White House has since made clear the plan was to disrupt weapons supply lines inside Iraq and that the United States was not preparing for military action against Iran or Syria.

 

Rep. Martin Meehan, a Massachusetts Democrat, said that while he did not trust Iran or its intentions in the Middle East, he also did not trust the White House. Meehan said the resolution on Iran was needed because the Bush administration had  lied so many times  in the run-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

 

Source: Reuters

Related articles:

«Attractive Dates» for Israel to strike Iran?
Fearing Taliban, Pakistan Cops resign
We can't defeat Taleban, says Brigadier Mark Carleton-Smith
Secret Pakistan-US Deal
The dog's fate: 'Vostok' and 'Zapad' gangs disbanded
Barack Obama did not respond to Dmitry Medvedev's congratulation
After Yevkurov's appointment as 'president of Ingushetia', Kadyrov demands to kill Yamadayev
Russia aims to be high on Obama's agenda
Obama's Russia challenge
Death of Dagestan's Sharia Jamaat leader fails to halt rebel attacks
Israeli officer who shot a handcuffed young man in Bil'in acquitted
Afghan officials aided an attack on U.S. invaders
Gaddafi's tent in central Grozny
The War on Teen Terror
Pamphlets protesting the execution of Amrozi and friends circulating widely in Solo
Peace Jirga or a new formula to compensate for the U.S. fiasco in Afghanistan
U.K. commander in Afghanistan resigns
US-IRAQ: Detainees may go from frying pan to fire
Maguire: U.N. is responsible for every death resulting from the siege on Gaza
Russia replaces Ingushetia puppet
Israel builds museum on Muslim graves
The torturer's tale
Syrians stage mass protest over deadly US raid
Truth be told, Iraq is still a living hell
Blasts occurred in Gali