Thu., 23.11.1435 Hjr / 18.09.2014, 12:40 Emirate time РусскийEnglishtürkçeعربي

main

mirrors

add. formats
Google
Kavkaz-Center
WWW
Our button

News feeds
 
WorldEvents Also in this section

American provider: ''Kavkaz Center is speech. It is not a bomb''

Publication time: 16 August 2013, 17:45

The Guardian reported on upheavals in the ongoing fight against the Kavkaz Center which does not abate in the information space and now affected a well-known American company that provides security services against DDoS attacks. In an article entitled "CloudFlare on censorship: 'A website is speech. It is not a bomb'," the newspaper writes:

 

"Content delivery network's chief executive responds angrily to questions about whether it is 'terrorists' little helper' for refusing to drop Chechen website.

 

The Kavkaz Center website is at the centre of the row over CloudFlare's policies.

 

Internet firm CloudFlare has hit back at a technology news site over suggestions that by providing its content delivery network (CDN) services to Chechen news site Kavkaz Center, it is supporting terrorism.

 

CloudFlare was contacted with questions about its policies by journalist James Cook from The Kernel, and chief executive Matthew Prince chose to reply with a sharply-worded blog post on its own site declaring its commitment to free speech.

 

(According to an article, published on a rival website, Pando Daily, "Cook's inflammatory questions included: Do you support campaigns of murder and terror waged [by some controversial group]? If not, why would you allow such hateful material to be protected by your services?" - KC.

 

"One of the greatest strengths of the United States is a belief that speech, particularly political speech, is sacred. A website, of course, is nothing but speech", wrote Prince, who returned to the theme later in his post.

 

"A website is speech. It is not a bomb. There is no imminent danger it creates and no provider has an affirmative obligation to monitor and make determinations about the theoretically harmful nature of speech a site may contain".

 

Cook's piece is due to be published today as part of The Kernel's relaunch after folding earlier in the year, but as its US rival PandoDaily has noticed, the text is already available by viewing the source code of its "Coming Soon" page.

 

The article - titled CloudFlare, Terrorists' Little Helper? - makes allegations about the operators and members of the Kavkaz Center site, and claims that it is "kept online" by CloudFlare in part through its use of the company's services "to protect against the frequent DDoS attacks it receives".

 

That's something Prince accepted in his blog post: "Removing this, or any other site, from our network wouldn't remove the content from the Internet: it would simply slow its performance and make it more vulnerable to attack," he wrote.

 

"As we have blogged about before, we often find ourselves on opposite sides of political conflicts. Fundamentally, we are consistent in the fact that our political beliefs will not color who we allow to be fast and safe on the web".

 

His comments have in turn been incorporated into the article - "Obviously his squeamishness about poking his nose where he shouldn't doesn't apply to journalism about CloudFlare," retorts Cook - providing a timely row to fuel the website's relaunch.

 

The issue is completely separate to the privacy debate fuelled by the recent NSA revelations, but both highlight the fact that companies like CloudFlare are likely to face growing scrutiny about their policies relating to customers and the data flowing through their networks.

 

In his blog post, Prince maintained that CDNs like CloudFlare should not be expected to take responsibility for cutting customers off until ordered to by a court.

 

"If we were to receive a valid court order that compelled us to not provide service to a customer then we would comply with that court order", he wrote.

 

"We have never received a request to terminate the site in question from any law enforcement authority, let alone a valid order from a court".

 

Department of Monitoring

Kavkaz Center



Russians sent to GULAG an Uralian for Hitler's speeches, distributed in the mainstream West
SYRIA. Exposure of spy network. Fightings in Damascus, Deir ez-Zor and Aleppo
PAKISTAN. Tehrik-e-Taliban neutralized enemy soldiers in attack on military fort
Double spy of the CIA and the KGB to be to be put on trial in Red Korea
Problem with dead bodies of 'non-existent' Russian soldiery in Ukraine solved Russian way
Turkey refuses fighting IS
RUSSIAN ENEMY. Experts demand from feckless and timid Western leaders to respond to Russian threat
On the day of publication of Obama's strategy to combat the IS, 28 commanders of the FML were killed in Syria
MINSK AGREEMENT. Battle for the east of Ukraine is for now lost for Kiev
Kremlin ringleader's bravado premature, warns former ambassador
One year ago, on September 7, 2013, Emir of CE Dokku Abu Usman martyred, Insha'Allah
Foreign Policy: Will Putin attack with nuclear weapons? Warsaw to hit first
Jordan doesn't enters NATO coalition against the IS
Moscow's homeless to be resettled in Russian-occupied Ukrainian Donbass
CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY: ''Putin is under Satan's spell and faces eternal damnation''
SYRIA. IF surrounds old fortress of Aleppo. Assadites bomb Raqqa
FUNERALS RUSSIAN WAY. No mass return of Russian soldiers in coffins, Russians dump their corpses in coal mines
Province of Dagestan. Fightings, ambushes, mass searches
Edward Lucas: ‘Russia is a revisionist power; greater dangers lie ahead’
RUSSIAN ENEMY. Daily Telegraph: Why aren't our troops in Ukraine?
SLATE: We are to expect genocide of Ukrainians by the Russians and total war in Europe
YEMEN. Mujahideen of Al-Qaeda kill and injure at least 53 enemy soldiers
Zbigniew Brzezinski: After Ukraine Moscow will attack Baltic countries
SOMALIA. MYM attacked intelligence headquarters in Mogadishu killing 15 soldiers
IRAQ. Fighting in provinces of Nineveh and Diyala. Iran threatens with 'sending of troops'